Press Release: Environmental Group Denounces House Energy Bill as Sham

For immediate release: June 29, 2009

Contacts: Maggie Zhou, maggie@securegreenfuture.org, 781-316-8283
                 Eli Beckerman, eli@securegreenfuture.org, 617-821-1453

Environmental Group Denounces House Energy Bill as Sham

The Waxman-Markey bill, or the American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES), that passed the US House on Friday, is a false climate-protection solution more appropriately characterized as a polluter-protection bill, according to leaders of Secure Green Future (SGF), a grassroots environmental group based in Massachusetts. The group joined a number of other statewide and national groups in calling for the bill to be withdrawn and completely rewritten.

URGENT! Tell Congress: Re-write the Fake Climate Bill!

Please forward broadly!

Dear Friends,

Would you flip a coin to determine whether hundreds of millions of people are forced into deadly climate migrations and conflict over desperate food and water shortages? Or how about whether countless species of our planet live or die?

Congress is poised to do 20 times worse than that as it prepares to vote on the American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACESA, also known as Waxman-Markey).  This legislation aims for a greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction target that is at best 20 times weaker than a 50/50 shot for avoiding catastrophic global warming! Even that abysmal target is fictional, because polluters are allowed to use "offsets" to actually INCREASE, not decrease, their pollution for decades to come. And to top it off, this bill shamefully repeals existing EPA power to regulate global warming pollution!

The vote could come to the House floor as soon as this Friday, June 26th.  Click here to see a sample letter to send to Congress.

Please tell your Congressional representative that ACESA/Waxman-Markey is a fake climate bill and must be withdrawn or voted down. Ask your representative to come up with a real climate solution that:

The US Climate Legislation We Need Should NOT Look Like This - the Waxman-Markey Bill, or ACESA, H.R. 2454

December 2009 is only 6 months away, and many know that whether the world will arrive at a strong climate treaty after the Kyoto Protocol expires in 2012, hinges predominantly on whether the world's largest per capita emitter, the country most responsible for the greenhouse gases currently in the air, and one of the wealthiest nations in the world, the USA, passes a strong domestic climate bill beforehand.

Lester Brown: Melting Ice Could Lead to Massive Waves of Climate Refugees

This latest dispatch from Lester Brown is adapted from Chapter 3, "Rising Temperatures and Rising Seas," of Plan B 3.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization  (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2008, available for free downloading and purchase at www.earthpolicy.org/Books/PB3/index.htm).

IPCC targets lead to (at least) 54% odds of catastrophic climate change

When regulating emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), nations around the world claim to use the GHG concentration stabilization target of 450 parts per million carbon dioxide equivalent (ppm CO2-eq) as recommended by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 2007, as their guildline for setting domestic emission reduction targets.

IPCC’s 2007 Fourth Assessment Report asserted that Annex I (developped) countries need to reduce GHG emissions 25- 40% below 1990 levels by 2020, and 80-95% below 1990 levels by 2050, in order to stabilize below 450 ppm CO2-eq concentration, after a temporary overshoot by 50 ppm. Such a stabilization pathway was said to provide a "reasonable chance" of averting warming beyond 2˚C above pre-industrial temperature that would lead to catastrophic consequences on human and ecological systems. Most countries that bothered with a climate legislation dropped the tougher end of the ranges, and touted targets such as 20% below 1990 level by 2020, and 80% below 1990 level by 2050, as aggressive climate policies that supposedly heeds the warnings of IPCC. The current US legislation under consideration, the Waxman-Markey bill, is even worse. (See my post on that bill)

"An Affordable Salvation", by Paul Krugman, and my comments to NYT

Paul Krugman wrote an excellent OP-ED "An Affordable Salvation" on New York Times, April 30, 2009. I wrote a letter-to-editor to comment on it (see bottom).

First, here are the highlights of what he wrote:

"It’s important to understand that just as denials that climate change is happening are junk science, predictions of economic disaster if we try to do anything about climate change are junk economics."

“Earth Day” dumped, "Triage Day" declared

Here is a great dark humor about Earth Day, by ClimateProgress blogger Joe Romm:
http://climateprogress.org/2009/04/19/renameearth-day-humor-triage-i-tol...

My comments to him is below:

Just the latest signs of accelerated meltdown

On the same day that we learned about a protective ice bridge in West Antarctica breaking off from an ice shelf the size of Jamaica, leaving the shelf in peril, scientists also reported more bad news to our north in the Arctic Sea. There, the thickness of sea ice this winter reached "a record wintertime low of just 378,000 square miles this year, down 43 percent from last year," according to Walt Meier, a scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center.

These two events, indicating problematic warming in both our northern and southern ice cover, will both have the ultimate effect of accelerating warming as sea ice melts into the ocean and the surface of the planet gets darker and less reflective.

Wendell Berry and Bill McKibben raise the bar for action

[The following is an open letter from Bill McKibben and Wendell Berry, calling for participation in the March 2nd Capitol Climate Action, including civil disobedience at a coal plant just outside of DC that is literally powering Congress with dirty energy. Please check out our local solidarity rallies on March 1st].

There are moments in a nation's -- and a planet's -- history when it may be necessary for some to break the law in order to bear witness to an evil, bring it to wider attention, and push for its correction. We think such a time has arrived, and we are writing to say that we hope some of you will join us in Washington D.C. on Monday March 2 in order to take part in a civil act of civil disobedience outside a coal-fired power plant near Capitol Hill.

We will be there to make several points:

Stop the Meltdown - Start the Future!

Save the Economy AND the Planet!

Our oil-addicted economy is beginning to unravel under the pressure of increasing oil prices and depletion of petroleum reserves. American blood and dollars are being squandered in endless wars to protect oil supplies. Climate change is already causing major disasters, and appears to be leading to an environmental catastrophe that will wreck the economy and destabilize human civilization. We can’t continue down this road much longer. If we do, our resources will be exhausted simply reacting to mounting problems, and we will be caught in an irreversible downward spiral. We need take a different path - a path away from oil addiction and toward a Secure Green Future.

“Today I challenge our nation to commit to producing 100 percent of our electricity from renewable energy and truly clean carbon-free sources within 10 years.”

- Al Gore, 7/17/08

Syndicate content